Thursday, December 26, 2019

Of Mice and Men Characters Descriptions, Analysis

The two central characters in Of Mice and Men are George Milton and Lennie Small, two migrant field workers searching for farm work in southern California during the 1930s. When the book begins, George and Lennie have just arrived at a new ranch; there, George and Lennie—and, through them, the readers—meet a fascinating cast of characters. Lennie Small Lennie Small is a large, gentle-hearted migrant worker who has a mental disability. He relies on George Milton, his lifelong friend and fellow migrant worker, for guidance and safety. In Georges presence, Lennie defers to his authoritative friend, but when George is not around, Lennie speaks more freely. Sometimes, he lets slip information that George told him to keep secret, like their plan to buy a plot of land. Lennie loves touching anything soft, from fabric to a mouses fur to a womans hair. He is a classic gentle giant, never seeking to cause harm, but his physical power unintentionally leads to destruction. We learn from George that he and Lennie had to leave their last farm because Lennie couldn’t refrain from touching a woman’s dress and was ultimately accused of rape. When Lennie receives a puppy as a gift from one of the other field workers, he accidentally kills it by petting it too strongly. Lennies inability to rein in his physical strength leads to trouble for both men, most notably when he accidentally kills Curleys wife. George Milton George Milton is both a domineering leader and a loyal protector of Lennie. The two men grew up together, but George exerts greater authority in the friendship because of Lennies dependence. George and Lennie frequently talk about getting land of their own. Lennie seems to take this plan very seriously, but Georges commitment is less clear. For example, rather than saving money to buy land in the future, George blows his savings  in one night while carousing at a bar. George sometimes complains about his care-taking role, but he is clearly committed to looking out for Lennie. However, his reasoning is never clearly explained. It may be that George stays with Lennie because the relationship gives him a sense of authority when his life otherwise lacks self-determination. He also likely takes comfort in Lennie’s familiarity, as the two men travel regularly and never stake much of a claim anywhere. After Lennie accidentally kills Curleys wife, George chooses to kill Lennie. The decision is an act of mercy to spare his friend from suffering at the hands of the other field workers. Curley Curley is the aggressive, short-statured son of the ranch owner. He struts around the farm authoritatively and is rumored to be a former Golden Gloves boxer. Curley constantly picks fights, especially with Lennie; one such fight leads to Lennie crushing Curleys hand. Curley wears a glove on one of his hands at all times. The other workers claim the glove is filled with lotion to keep his hand delicate for his wife. Curley is, in fact, very jealous and protective of his wife, and he frequently fears she is flirting with the other workers. After Lennie accidentally kills Curleys wife, Curley leads the other workers on a murderous hunt for the newcomer. Candy Candy is an aging ranch handyman who lost one of his hands years ago in an accident. As a result of both his disability and his age, Candy worries about his future on the farm. When Lennie reveals that he and George are planning to buy land of their own, Candy feels he has received a stroke of luck, and he offers up $350 in order to join them. Candy, like Lennie, genuinely believes in this plan, and as a result he is sympathetic towards George and Lennie throughout the novella, even going so far as to help George delay the hunt for Lennie following Curley’s wife’s death. Crooks Crooks, who got his nickname because of his misshapen back, is a stable hand and the sole African American worker on the ranch. Because of his race, Crooks is disallowed from living in the barn with the other workers. Crooks is bitter and cynical, but nevertheless gets along well with Lennie, who doesnt share the other workers racism. Even though George has sworn him to secrecy, Lennie tells Crooks that he and George are planning to buy land. Crooks expresses deep skepticism. He tells Lennie that he’s heard all sorts of people talk about all sorts of plans, but that none of them ever actually happened. Later in the same scene, Curleys wife approaches the two men, chatting flirtatiously. When Crooks asks her to leave, Curleys wife hurls racial epithets at him and says that she could have him lynched. The incident is humiliating to Crooks, who then has to apologize to Curley’s wife in front of Lennie and Candy despite being the wronged party. Curley’s Wife Curleys wife is a young, pretty woman whose name is never mentioned in the novella. Her husband, Curley, is jealous and distrustful, and he frequently snaps at her. She has a sweet side, demonstrated when she tells Lennie about her childhood dreams of movie stardom, as well as a cruel streak, as evidenced by the racist verbal attack she launches at Crooks. Curleys wife precipitates the book’s climax by asking Lennie to stroke her hair, whereupon Lennie inadvertently kills her. Curleys wife is less developed than other characters, and she seems to serve mostly to drive the plot forward and stir up conflict.

Wednesday, December 18, 2019

Essay about Gender Issues in Religion - 1633 Words

Gender Issues in Religion Amongst the world religions are many different attitudes towards gender issues and sexuality. A hundred years ago, or even a lot less, these different perspectives did not exist, as they were often considered unimportant, as King noted until recently little attention has been paid to gender differences and their impact on religious teaching and practice.[1] With some religions, their scriptures are considered to be infallible and therefore not to be questioned. So the question itself are religions sexist is a fairly new one. Some religions are thought of as being more sexist than others, but then there are also religions that that do not share the shame ideas†¦show more content†¦Women are still not allowed to be priests, despite the fact that there are many examples in the Bible of Jesus telling people through parables and other means that everyone is equal. Some Catholics just accept the fact that women cannot be priests in the Catholic Church, as this is the Popes orde rs and he is infallible. Nobody seems to dispute that the Pope must be male, firstly because Pope means father and maybe because they know that the idea of a woman becoming Pope is just too unlikely. However there are Catholics that exist who believe in the authority of the Pope but, are convinced that the Pope and his advisors in Romeare making a serious mistake by dismissing women as priests.[3] This website details the reasons for women not being accepted for ordination, but also reasons why this is wrong. Evidence is given that there were a few heretical sects in existence that allowed women to be priests, as well as passages written by various saints that do not condemn the idea of female ordination. It does not seem that the Vatican are going to change their minds on this subject anytime soon, so this is a valid example of a religion maintaining a sexist attitude even when there is opposition. Fortunately, not all of the Christian denominations have taken this stance. The Anglican Church has proved that they take the idea of equality seriously, as in 1992 TheShow MoreRelatedReligion And Religion Essay1314 Words   |  6 PagesReligion is universal. Although people may have different ideologies and practices, everyone believes in something, whether they deem it their religion or not. In this way, religion is a powerful connection between all of humanity; thus, it is important to understand the people behind religion and how their unique characteristics correlates with and influences religion—whether that be their social class, ethnicity, gender, or politics. However, ethnicity and gender, along with the closely linkedRead MoreThe Work Of Maria Del Mar Alonso Almeida1390 Words   |  6 PagesThere are 3,418,059,380 women in the world (Geohive.com, 2015) and yet, women, in 2010, earned a staggering 19% lesser in wages across the world (Economist, 2011). Such wage differentials have been a cause of gender inequality and thereby segregation in the workforce across the globe. The staggering numbers of economic contributions of women compared to men has however, highlighted that there are fewer women to men ratios in the workforce due to the where we live, maternal implications (pregnancies)Read MoreLiving As Woman And A Muslim Essay1235 Words   |  5 Pages To further reiterate this concept, I will attempt to discuss how social issues surrounding my gender and my religion as a Muslim woman living in the United States have changed my sociological imagination and I how I was able to shift my perspective by thinking from a different point of view thus applying the C. Wright Mills’ concept of sociological imagination in my personal life. by making references to articles, â€Å"Gender as Structure† (Ferguson, 291) and â€Å"Muslims in America† (Ferguson, 519). IRead MoreA Literature Review of the Popular Opinion on Abortion1651 Words   |  7 Pagesï » ¿Literature Review Popular Opinion on Abortion Abortion has long been a source of acrimonious and controversial debate. It touches upon key ethical, moral, philosophical, biological, and legal issues. Opinions about abortion tend to be rooted in fundamental personal values which are unlikely to change. Many people, especially Christians, regard abortion as murder. Such people oppose abortion in varying degrees, calling their position Pro-Life. Others regard abortion as an excruciating yet criticalRead MoreThe Social Of A Social Institution908 Words   |  4 PagesConnect structure to your social issue/topic: 1.) What social institutions are connected to your social issue/topic? My topic is gender roles in society the social institutions which influence to the stigmatization of gender are: Family: Throughout history women and men have been stigmatized into categories based on their biological sex. Parents from day one address their child based on their physical characteristics of either a male or female. Family has a great influence because they teach theirRead MoreMonotheistic religions, especially Judaism, Christianity, and Islam promote the belief in One God;1600 Words   |  7 PagesMonotheistic religions, especially Judaism, Christianity, and Islam promote the belief in One God; all that exists is because of God. Through prophets and scripture, God portrays moral goodness and truth. Essentially, these three religions believe that God speaks to us, unveils God’s Being, and seeks to guide us through life. In turn, humans should embody the moral goodness and excellence that is revealed to us by God. These religions are taught based upon both scripture and reason. When readingRead MoreInfluence of Religion1056 Words   |  5 PagesInfluence of Religion on Dev eloping Societies Linda Randolph HIS 103 World Civilizations 1 Instructor: Robert Solomon October 30, 2011 Before Jesus Christ, people in early civilization have been looking for the one who is going to bring hope, peace, and someone strong and not weak. Religion has had an effect on society, it will always be important in our life because of Christianity. Christianity and Islam are the two most popular religions. They areRead MoreEthics And Standards For Professional Psychology1264 Words   |  6 Pagesspirituality and religion in a therapeutic setting. This paper includes examples and information regarding upholding the Ethics Code while using religion and spiritual reasoning in psychology. It addresses the issues of a multi-faith setting, information and research on omitting religion and spirituality as well as the importance of maintaining a bias view of any and all religious and spiritual values. This paper also identifies the benefits reported when using Secular and Theistic therapy. Religion and SpiritualityRead MoreIssues Influencing The Society Today1610 Words   |  7 Pages There are numerous issues influencing the society today. In fact, it is quite shocking that they keep on increasing as time goes by. Moreover, most of these social issues are perpetuated through the people’s strive for superiority. For instance, racism keeps on escalating due to the fact that some races want to prove their dominance over the rest. Consequently, the parties involved in such scenarios end up being either the victim or perpetrator. Charlotte Perkins Gilman illustrates the state ofRead MoreCultural Practices Influence The Way We Perceive The World1682 Words   |  7 PagesA major issue that is affected by culture is sexuality. A subtopic of sexuality is, slut shaming. Slut shaming is, â€Å"the act of making any person feel guilty or inferior for certain sexual behaviors or desires that deviate from traditional or orthodox gender expectations,† (Your Dictionary). My outside source, â€Å"Teen girls’ sexual double standards and sexting: Gend ered value in digital image exchange,† explains the prominent gender inequalities and sexual double standards. However, the issue of culture

Tuesday, December 10, 2019

Spelucian Explorers Essay Research Paper BRIEF OF free essay sample

Spelucian Explorers Essay, Research Paper BRIEF OF THE CASE Speluncean Explorers v. Court of General Instances of the County of Stowfield ( 4300 ) Supreme Court of Newgarth Summary of the Key Facts A. Five members of the Speluncean Society went into a cave to research. While they were in the cave a landslide occurred covering the entryway and pin downing them in. B. Twenty yearss subsequently after the entrapment messages were sent from the adventurers to a deliverance squad outside of the cave. C. The adventurers explained their conditions and rations to physicians and asked if they would be able to last until the predicted day of the month they would be saved. The physicians said no. D. Eight hours subsequently, Roger Whetmore talking on behalf of the adventurers, asked if they could last if they ate one of their ain. The physicians said yes. E. Whetmore than asked the physicians if it would be advisable to project tonss to find who should be eaten. The physicians didn # 8217 ; t reply. He so asked if any justice, functionary, curate, or priest was present none of the saviors said they were. F. On the 20 3rd twenty-four hours Whetmore was eaten. G. Whetmore was the adventurer who came up with the thought of killing person in order for the others to last. H. Whetmore besides came up with the thought of turn overing die to make up ones mind who would be killed I. After the deliverance of the four staying adventurers on the 30 2nd twenty-four hours the subsisters were indicted for the slaying of Roger Whetmore. The Issue Is being trapped in a cave with small opportunity to populate an exclusion to the legislative act N.C.S.A ( N.S. ) 12-A? The Keeping No. The Supreme Court sentenced the four subsisters to decease for the slaying of Roger Whetmore. Summary of Courts Reasoning The Supreme Court was equally divided so the original strong belief of slaying from the Court of General Instances was affirmed. Law and morality most decidedly portion a relationship. Lon L. Fuller, the writer of # 8220 ; The Case of the Speluncean Explorers # 8221 ; , distinguishes this connexion between the morality of responsibility and the morality of aspiration, both of which bear on the design and operation of societal establishments. Well in this instance, the societal establishment happens to be the Supreme tribunal of Newgarth in the twelvemonth 4300. A group of four members of the Speluncean Society, which was an organisation for amateurs interested in the geographic expedition of caves, are appealing at that place sentence handed to them from the Court of General Instances of the county of Stowfield. A panel of five justnesss presided over the instance, and after extended hearings, each justness reached a alone opinion. The events that took topographic point in the instance are a spot extraordinary. Roger Whitmore and the four suspects, besides members of the society, penetrated the inside of a limestone cavern. While they journeyed further into the cave, a landslide occurred, and jammed the lone means of entryway and issue for the cave. As the work forces realized they were in a serious state of affairs, they set cantonment near the bowlders that set them apart from the universe to wait on a deliverance party. The undertaking to take the bowlders proved to be a hard one for the saviors, and yearss went by without success. On the 30 2nd twenty-four hours, success was eventually achieved, but merely four members of the society had survived this calamity. The adventurers carried into the cave merely light commissariats, so the demand for nutrient was great in order to last. The life of one of the adventurers was taken by the others to utilize as nutriment for the staying subsisters. The testimony hear d in the first instance, declared that the life of Roger Whetmore had been taken, but it was he who ab initio proposed the violent death of one adventurer to feed the staying. Whetmore proposed the peal of die to declare the victim. The die flip went against Whetmore, so he was put to decease and eaten by his comrades. This is where the tribunals enter this eccentric instance. After the subsisters were treated and released from a stay in the infirmary, they were indicted for the slaying of Roger Whetmore. A test found the suspects guilty of slaying and sentenced them to be hanged. The suspects wanted the instance to be sent to a higher tribunal and it was heard before a panel of five justnesss. This is where the doctrine of law enters the instance. Be the work forces out of line by perpetrating slaying to protract their lives? Harmonizing to the Torahs of the Commonwealth, yes. The linguistic communication of this state of affairs is good known, # 8220 ; Whoever shall wilfully take the life of another, shall be punished by death. # 8221 ; But if you take the natural jurisprudence point of position, which is # 8220 ; when a state of affairs arises in which the coexistence of work forces becomes impossible, so a status that underlies all of our case in points and statues has ceased to exist. # 8221 ; ( Foster, pp.620 ) . This means that the work forces in the cave were in such a quandary, that all common jurisprudence known to adult male ceases to be, and the work forces are bounded by no known law. The jurisprudence now rests entirely in their custodies. The five justnesss take different positions on the doctrine of law. Justice Truepenny, C.J. admires the determination made by the jury and test justice. He feels they complied with the lone class that was unfastened to them under the jurisprudence. Statue N.C.S.A. ( n.c. ) Sec. 12-A, The wilful pickings of another adult males life must be punishable by decease licenses no exclusion to this instance and our personal understandings must non dominate the strength of this legislative act. Truepennny feels though as if executive mildness seems suited for a instance like this. Some kind of forgiveness or forgiveness should be sent out to the suspects. If this is done, so some kind of justness will be accomplished without impairing the psyche of our legislative acts and without offering any encouragement for the neglect of jurisprudence. Justice Foster, J. does non see it as Truepenny does. Foster believes something more is on test than the destiny of these work forces. That is the jurisprudence of our Commonwealth. The jurisprudence should non oblige that these adventurers are liquidators. He believes it declares them to be guiltless of any offense at all resting on two independent evidences. One is the inapplicability of the positive jurisprudence of this Commonwealth including all its legislative acts and case in points. The instance should be handled in the mode of what ancient authors in Europe and America call # 8221 ; the jurisprudence of nature # 8221 ; . This means when adult male is in so far over his caput that coexistence becomes impossible, the force of positive jurisprudence should vanish. Precisely as in this state of affairs where the pickings of one life was able to protract others, the basic premises underlying our full legal order must lose their significance and force. Legal power rests on a ter ritorial footing. These work forces were reasonably much life in their ain # 8220 ; private and secluded # 8221 ; universe unachievable by any foreigners The jurisprudence of nature entitles these work forces to do their ain Torahs and legal powers within the confines of their cave. So the life of Roger Whetmore was taken in a # 8220 ; province of civil society # 8221 ; , but instead in a # 8220 ; province of nature # 8221 ; . Foster has no trouble saying that under these rules, the adventurers were guiltless of any offense. What these work forces did was done on pursuit of an understanding accepted by all and foremost proposed by Whetmore himself. Their extraordinary quandary left them no pick but to go forth the usual rules that regulate work forces # 8217 ; s dealingss and organize some kind of authorities related to the state of affairs at manus. Foster # 8217 ; s 2nd land returns by rejecting his full expounding of the first land. For intents of statement, Foster states he is incorrect in stating that the state of affairs these work forces found themselves in removes them from the effects of our positive jurisprudence. It is assumed that the Consolidated Statutes have the power to perforate five 100 pess of solid stone. These work forces without a uncertainty violated the legislative act that states # 8220 ; he who shall wilfully take the life of another is a slaying # 8221 ; . An illustration of taking legislative acts actual word for word is in Commonwealth v. Staymore. The suspect here had his vehicle parked in a two hr parking zone, but due to a political presentation, was unable to take his auto within the two hr bound. His strong belief was set aside by the tribunal, although his instance fell forthrightly within the diction of the legislative act. Legislative acts are neer taken actual. The legislative act that hol ds the destiny of the adventurers has neer been applied literally. Take for illustration violent death in ego defence. The codified references nil about this exclusion, yet liquidators for centuries have been set free by this supplication. The legislative act at manus was non intended to use to ego defence instances. A adult male endangering the life of another would of course drive the threatened adult male. The same logical thinking is applicable to the instance at manus. If a group of work forces of all time find themselves in a quandary such as adventurers, you can be certain determinations on whether to populate or decease will non be controlled by the contents of our jurisprudence. Therefore, the legislative act in inquiry does non at all apply to the instance at manus such as the ego defence supplication. Foster’s decisions is that the suspects are guiltless of the slaying of Whetmore, and the strong belief should be set aside. Justice Tatting finds himself allowing his ain emotions get the better of him when sing this instance. He finds himself lacerate between understanding for the adventurers and disgust in the barbarous act they committed. Tating finds Justice Foster # 8217 ; s sentiments on the instance shooting through # 8220 ; contradictions and false beliefs # 8221 ; . Tatting is confused in Foster # 8217 ; s point that the work forces were non in a province of civil society, but instead in a province of nature. When precisely did this passage from civil to nature take topographic point? That is the inquiry that baffles Tatting and it is an uncertainness that produces a batch of troubles. Tating uses an illustration that what if a adult male in the cave had his 20 foremost birthday. Is he 21 at the exact clip of his birthday, or does the # 8220 ; new character of authorities # 8221 ; non do him twenty-one? Justice Foster and Tatting are appointed Judgess of a tribunal of the Commonwealth of Ne wgarth, sworn and empowered to continue the Torahs of that Commonwealth. Entering a tribunal of nature, what sort of authorization does a justness clasp now? If the adventurers were under a tribunal of nature, what gives the justness # 8217 ; s power to implement. Nothing at all. We are in a province of positive jurisprudence, non in a province of nature. Another deduction embarked by Foster that Justice Tatting can non happen tolerable is the existent slaying of Whetmore and the manner in which it took topographic point, by their deal. Suppose Whetmore had a pistol and blasted his comrades before they attacked him. Whetmore would of course be made out the liquidator, since the alibi of ego defence would hold to be denied to him. You can non try to kill the adult male who releases the gas in the gas chamber and name it self defence. The natural jurisprudence in the cave called for the decease of Whetmore, and the decease of him must be upheld. All the considerations brought Forth b y Foster make it difficult for Tating to make a decision. Tatting has a difficult clip get bying with Foster # 8217 ; s 2nd sentiment which states # 8220 ; no statue whatever its linguistic communication, should be applied in a manner that contradicts its purpose. # 8221 ; In Commonwealth v. Valjean, the suspect was indicted for the theft of a loaf of staff of life. His defence was that he was hungering to decease and needed that staff of life to last. The tribunal refused to except the defence. If hungriness can non warrant the larceny of wholesome and tasty nutrient, how could it warrant the violent death and feeding of a adult male. Foster # 8217 ; s position would hold caused the tribunal to overturn Commonwealth v. Valjean, by # 8220 ; reading between the lines # 8221 ; of that peculiar legislative act that forbids larceny. Tating concludes Foster # 8217 ; s statements are intellectually unsound. Yet, he finds it absurd to direct these work forces to decease when the cost of 10 workingmans # 8217 ; s lives were lost in deliveri ng the adventurers. The baffled Tatting declared his backdown from the determination in this instance. Justice Keen would authorise executive Clemency to the suspects if the strong belief is affirmed. But that is a inquiry for the Chief Executive, non for the tribunals to make up ones mind. Due to all the ordeals that adventurers have been through and all they have suffered, he felt they have already paid for their offense, if there was at all a offense that was committed. The exclusive inquiry that lies before the panel is whether the suspects did, within the significance of codified N.C.S.A.secl2-A, wilfully take the life of Roger Whetmore. Obviously, in every sense of that legislative act, the suspects are guilty. This is where all the troubles of the instance take action. All these troubles trace back to a individual beginning, and that beginning is the failure to separate the legal from the moral facet of this instance. Truepenny, Foster, and Tatting do non like the fact that grounds against the suspects proves them guilty. But unlike them, Keen puts his personal feelings aside a nd takes the autonomy to continue the jurisprudence of his Commonwealth. It is the duty of the bench to implement dependably the written jurisprudence, and to construe the jurisprudence in conformity with its field significance without mention to our personal desires or our single constructs of justness. The procedure of judicial reform requires three stairss: 1 ) Divine some individual # 8220 ; aim # 8221 ; which the legislative act service 2 ) Discover that a fabulous being called # 8220 ; the legislative assembly # 8221 ; , in the chase of this imagined intent # 8221 ; , over looked something or left some spread or imperfectness in his work. 3 ) To make full in the space therefore created, Quod erat faciendum. This instance is a theoretical account for all theoretical accounts in instances that illustrate the gap-filling procedure. If we do non cognize the intent of Sec. 12-A, how can we perchance say there is a spread in it. Merely the draughtsmans of that legislative act really cognize the # 8220 ; true # 8217 ; significance of slaying. Keen # 8217 ; s determination is a difficult determination and that type is neer a popular 1. Keen concludes that the strong belief should be affirmed. Justice Handy is the fifth and concluding justness to preside over this instance. Handy is amazed at his co-worker # 8217 ; s ability to throw an befoging drape of legalisms about every issue presented to them for determination. Handy # 8217 ; s merely letdown was that his fellow Justices failed to originate the issue of the legal nature of the deal struck in the cave. Whether it was one-sided or bilateral, and whether Whetmore could non be considered as holding revoked an offer prior to the slaying. Handy takes the point of position that authorities is a human matter, and work forces are ruled by other work forces, non words on paper or abstract theories. Of all the subdivisions of authorities, the bench is the most likely to touch with the common adult male. The public tends to maintain a tie between the jurisprudence and adult male. A newspaper held a canvass that said # 8221 ; what do you believe the Supreme Court should make with the Speluncean Explorers? # 8221 ; Ninety per centum of those who reported back expressed the belief that the suspects should be pardoned. Handy # 8217 ; s reasoning comment has to make with executive Clemency. Due to the Chief Executives aging old ages, he feels he is incapable of passing these work forces forgivenesss. He holds really stiff impressions. The public blare will non continue with him for it really has a contrary affect. So in return, Justice Handy finds the suspects inexperienced person of the offense charged, and that the strong belief and sentence should be set aside. The Supreme Court, being equally divided, the strong belief of the tribunal of General Instances is affirmed. Each suspect is ordered to be hanged around the cervix until decease. In decision, I feel this instance if it was existent would of been really interesting to see unfold. In today # 8217 ; s society I think that the suspects would hold been pardon for the # 8220 ; offense # 8221 ; they committed. If they were non pardoned I do non believe executing would hold been an option. This instance was really interesting to read. You can look at what happened as slaying or endurance of the fittest. There are so many different sentiments and ways you can look at what go on. If you believe that case in points and statues are what need to be followed with no exclusions, so yes the four suspects should be found guilty and sentenced to decease. If you think that under the fortunes the actions that were taken for the four to last were sensible, so yes they should be pardoned. If I was in the cave I don # 8217 ; t think I would of merely raffled my life off. It is difficult for me to even believe of eating a dead organic structure, so it is even harder for me to be lieve of what I would of done if I was in that state of affairs. As I am sitting in forepart of the computing machine typing this paper in a clime controlled room, with dinner consumed less than two hours ago I would hold to state that what I would of done is non kill or raffle for some 1s decease. What I would propose is no 1 gets killed, but the first one to decease is eaten. This is the lone logical determination I can believe of. Why should anyone give their life for me. It # 8217 ; s non like one individuals life is more of import than the other. If I was the justice on this instance I would hold found them guilty of slaying, but condemn them to two old ages of therapy, and non decease or prison clip. I would condemn them to therapy because if you eat a dead individual I pretty certain your traveling to hold some sort of psychological jobs.

Monday, December 2, 2019

The Health Problems in Pregnancy Associated with Coccaine Essay Example

The Health Problems in Pregnancy Associated with Coccaine Paper There are many health problems that are known to be associated with the use of cocaine. They include heart rhythm disturbances, heart attacks, respiratory issues, chest pain, neurological effects, seizures, headaches, strokes, stomach pain, upset and nausea and sometimes death(COCAINE http://www. focusas. com/Cocaine. html). The impact of cocaine use during pregnancy cannot be ignored as the above issues pass through the placenta to the fetus, but there is also a risk of lowered IQ in the child who was exposed to cocaine during gestation. MONITORS There are several measures in place to help those addicted to cocaine to stop using the drug during pregnancy. Some of those include legal monitoring through a court order, social workers and mentors. All of these measures can be effective depending on the willingness of the participant and the attitude of the monitor. The attitude of the person monitoring the expectant mother can have a positive or a negative impact on the outcome. If the monitor has a positive, upbeat attitude that conveys a WE can do it attitude, the mother will be less apt to feel that she is being treated like an addict who is beneath society. We will write a custom essay sample on The Health Problems in Pregnancy Associated with Coccaine specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on The Health Problems in Pregnancy Associated with Coccaine specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on The Health Problems in Pregnancy Associated with Coccaine specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer She will be more apt to feel that it is a team effort and that everyone involved cares not only about the health and safety of her unborn child but also cares about her health and safety. Making a pregnant woman feel that the only concern is about the baby and that she is of little consequence can further damage an already fragile self esteem which can lead to cravings to get high and numb the pain. It is important to create a team atmosphere and attitude so that the mother feels she is part of the solution and not just the problem. The use of urinary testing as a monitor can be highly effective if the mother understands that it is to help her get past the cravings for the drug. In addition, the knowledge that she is putting her baby at risk for being placed in foster care following birth if she fails the screenings may assist her in overcoming or getting past craving the drug. Mandatory drug screens for newborn babies should be implemented for every baby, not just those who have known drug using mothers. It should be as simple and mandatory as other tests and procedures performed on newborns. This is a tool that can have a positive impact as it creates a data base for programs to get in touch with mothers whose babies came back with a positive result. It is not necessary to instantly remove any baby with a positive result but an immediate social service referral can be implemented and that can have an early intervention impact on the newborns life and success rate. CONCLUSION? Cocaine is a drug that can be highly addictive and can be harmful to an unborn baby. Few women consciously want to hurt their babies. They often need help and monitoring with their addiction to insure that they stay away from the drug during the gestational phase of pregnancy and delivery. It is important to have a team attitude so the mother believes she is part of the solution and not the problem if the monitoring is going to work.